Moz Blog |
| Time for Guest Blogging With a Purpose Posted: 23 Jan 2014 02:46 AM PST Posted by jennita Dear Readers, before getting to the meat of the post about how to make guest blogging work for you and not end up looking like a spammer, I'd like to tell you a little story. A story about when Matt Cutts single-handedly changed the course of my day. The story goes a little something like this... It was a chilly, yet calm Monday afternoon in the Moz office, as I was having lunch at my desk and watching over all the Moz social channels (a task I rarely do these days, as we have a team of awesome ladies who usually does it). As I was checking my personal Twitter feed though, I saw a tweet from Matt Cutts pointing to his latest blog post, "The decay and fall of guest blogging for SEO." Quickly I jumped over to read the blog and… BOOM, this was the first paragraph: Okay, I'm calling it: if you're using guest blogging as a way to gain links in 2014, you should probably stop. Why? Because over time it's become a more and more spammy practice, and if you're doing a lot of guest blogging then you're hanging out with really bad company. "Oh dear," I thought to myself. "My day just got a whole lot more interesting." It didn't take long before people starting asking questions about whether sites like Moz and our YouMoz blog would be in danger. People were unsure as to what exactly his post meant. Was he saying there was going to be an algo change, as Rand predicted in last week's Whiteboard Friday? Was he saying that all guest blogging was dead, or that all guest blogging had become spammy? Did he mean that all links in guest posts now should be nofollowed? Essentially, the SEO world got its crazy on.
Immediately I was fielding all sorts of questions, from how Moz discourages spam links in guest posts, to how it'd be crazy to ban us from Google. There were also lots of jokes going on… you know, things like letting Keri (our YouMoz manager), stay longer on her vacation. But I digress; let me get back to Matt's blog post. In it, he also has this to say: "Ultimately, this is why we can't have nice things in the SEO space: a trend starts out as authentic. Then more and more people pile on until only the barest trace of legitimate behavior remains. We've reached the point in the downward spiral where people are hawking "guest post outsourcing" and writing articles about "how to automate guest blogging. "So stick a fork in it: guest blogging is done; it's just gotten too spammy. In general I wouldn't recommend accepting a guest blog post unless you are willing to vouch for someone personally or know them well. Likewise, I wouldn't recommend relying on guest posting, guest blogging sites, or guest blogging SEO as a linkbuilding strategy." I giggled at the "this is why we can't have nice things in SEO" line. In fact, I'm pretty sure I'd heard it phrased exactly that way before. But what really caught my eye was this, "We've reached the point in the downward spiral…" Wait… hadn't Rand said the exact same thing three days ago in his Whiteboard Friday? Wait… wasn't it called "Why Guest Posting and Blogging is a Slippery Slope???" Of course, others caught on to this as well. But the point really isn't about how Rand can see the future; it's about how Matt wasn't actually saying anything we didn't already know. Right? No, seriously.
Ok, ok, so maybe it wasn't totally obvious to everyone, or else the post wouldn't have been written, eh? So how do you proceed if you were using guest posting as a link building strategy? (By the way, guest posting is a tactic, not a strategy.) Guest post with a purposeAs with anything, you don't want to be out there trying willy-nilly to get your posts on every blog for the sole purpose of building (probably bad) links. It's important to have this tied to your business and marketing goals, as you would with any other tactic. SEO is only one piece of the larger strategy, and if you focus solely on writing posts for link building purposes, you're missing out on a ton of other possibilities, such as:
Imagine if you were to focus on writing an amazing blog post, with actionable information, relevant to the community of the blog you're pitching. No, reallyâ€"you should do that. Believe me, that's how you're going to get a post on YouMoz. :) As Sir Dr. Pete (I added the Sir, because he's older than me ;) ) so eloquently stated today in an internal thread about this very topic, "You've got to make sure you're not a one trick link-building pony. I mean, any time you base 80% or more of your link profile on one tactic/gimmick, you're going to eventually be in trouble. The problem isn't guest-posting, it's abuse." People, the doctor has spoken. But how, you ask? How do you ensure that you don't come across as spammy or a "one trick link-building pony?" For this, I'd like to introduce you to Everett Sizemore. He's an Associate here at Moz, and mostly focuses on helping out in Q&A. But in his real job, he's the Director of R&D, Special Projects, and Moonshine over at seOverflow. (Hey Everett, how does one go about getting an amazing job title like that, anyway??) Over the past few days we've had some email discussions about guest posting. We discussed how Google might determine a post is spammy, how they'd determine one was legit, and ways in which SEOs and all the other online marketers out there should be guest blogging legitimately. Well, Everett had the answer that we all agreed was the best answer, so now I happily present to you... Everett's tips on how to be a better guest posterHe stated that seOverflow wasn't panicking in the least because they were changing their internal guest posting guidelines to now include language like this:
With that said, this 'tactic' is taking a back seat in our arsenal of options in any content marketing strategy. Our goal these days is to find the influencers in any niche and pay an expert to write expert-level content, no matter where it gets placed, to help further our clients business goals, primarily through online customer acquisition driven by good content. That's good stuff right there. Essentially, be a real person, write posts with purpose beyond just building links. How can guest blogging sites stay credible?Since we're on the subject, let's talk about sites like the Huffington Post, Tech Crunch, Smashing Magazine, and even the Google Analytics blog. All of those sites, along with our own YouMoz and Moz Blog, allow guest posts. One thing that's common across all of these sites is that they have rigorous editing. They simply don't allow for just anyone write a post about anything. They read through posts for accuracy, to ensure that links aren't simply "link drops," and to ensure focus on actual, good, helpful content. But let's say you allow guest posts, but you're not quite as strict about things right now? Here are a few tips to make sure your blog stays credible, even with guest posts:
Guest blogging isn't deadLet me wrap this up by stating again that guest blogging isn't dead by any means. But being a Spammy McSpammer only caring about links, and not caring about real content, community building, branding, and all those other great benefits... is dead. Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read!  | ||||||||
| Make Facebook's Algorithm Change Work For You, Not Against You Posted: 22 Jan 2014 03:16 PM PST Posted by Chad Wittman - Founder @EdgeRank Checker This post was originally in YouMoz, and was promoted to the main blog because it provides great value and interest to our community. The author's views are entirely his or her own and may not reflect the views of Moz, Inc. Recently, many Facebook page admins have experienced a significant decrease in Total Reachâ€"specifically, organic reach. For pages that want to keep their ad budget as low as possible, maximizing organic reach is vital. To best understand how to make a change like this work for you, and not against you, we need to examine what happenedâ€"and what you can do about it. We analyze and monitor this type of data for thousands of pages with a tool called EdgeRank Checker. By monitoring metrics such as reach and engagement over time, we can get a better understanding of how to advise companies to continue to optimize their strategy. We've collected this data over the past few months against roughly 1,000 anonymous Facebook pages. What happened?Facebook page admins most often run into two metrics: reach and engagement. Facebook presents this data when viewing your posts by showing the number of likes, comments, and shares, along with how many people saw the post. What does "1,000 people saw this post" actually mean, though? Facebook adds up everyone who saw the post, whether you paid for people to see it, people shared it with their friends, or Facebook gave you free distribution in the news feed. The people who saw it for free combine with the people who shared it to create "organic reach." When people see your post because you paid for additional exposure, they call it "paid reach."
On December 2, 2013, Facebook announced that they would be placing an emphasis on links while continuing to punish meme content in the news feed. Around this time, we noticed a significant drop in organic reach for many pages. Page admins around the world were reporting a drastic drop in their organic reach. Not all pages were severely impacted by the change, but the majority seemed to be impacted negatively. We've seen changes like this in the past. In fact, every time we've ever studied organic reach (we've been monitoring it closely for ~three years) we've found it has decreased over time. The reason being that the past three years have seen steady growth from Facebook, which means increased competition to get into the news feed. During this time, Facebook has continued to improve its news feed algorithm to focus on quality contentâ€"raising the bar for any page on the platform. Examining the numbersIn the graph below, the first bar represents September 2012 (for a reference point), while the rest of the bars represent months within 2013. Over a year ago, organic reach fared much better than it does today. In the past few months, we've seen a decrease from 12.6% to 7.7%. We specifically examined the 28 days before and after December 2nd: When changes like this have occurred in the past, Facebook has tended to defend its news feed changes by attempting to keep engagement rates roughly equal. How did engagement data fare? In general, engagement levels for pages fluctuated within normal variations. In some cases, engagement actually increased. From Facebook's perspective, this is a good change for their news feed; it provides a better experience for the typical Facebook user, as they are seeing less of the stuff they don't want to engage with. How did different content types fare?All of the content types experienced decreases over the time period analyzed. Status updates continue to outperform videos, photos, and links for organic reach. Status updates have held strongly over the past year as the top-performing content type for organic reach. A look at individual pagesNot all pages were impacted the same. We saw some pages experience drastic decreases, while others were positively impacted by the change. We examined a few of these pages to dig deeper into theories on why they may have been impacted so extremely. Some pages experienced significant, and abrupt, decreases in reach: The page above experienced a significant decrease closer towards December 5th. After the change, not a single post experienced more than 15% organic reach (compared to their previous average around 25%). This page posted mostly status updates and often asked for engagement. Take a look at their status updates when asking for engagement: In the graph above, you can see a clear and abrupt change around December 6th. However, other pages experienced significant improvement: The page above experienced an increase after the change (we found a few of these). This page exclusively posted photos over this time period and did not regularly ask for engagement. Let's take a look at their photo posts: Around December 8th, this page experienced an increased average in organic reach. It benefited from the change. After that point, this page did not have as many low-reaching posts, and had many more high-reaching posts (note: our system maxed them out at 100% impressions / fan). What did these pages do differently?
Interestingly, Facebook did specifically reiterate that they would be focusing on "high quality content" that isn't often using drastic calls to action to attract engagement. This may be the reason behind the difference in organic reach. In an informal poll of Facebook admins, a vast majority of respondents self-reported drastic decreases. Sprinkled throughout the responses were some admins who were able to reduce the impact of the change (or even improve it). In our data, we found ~80% pages experienced a decrease over the time period. 7 tips to gain reach instead of losing itThe pages that were least impacted by the changes tended to focus on avoiding meme content, as well as avoiding frequent use of calls to action. Facebook is attempting to decrease these types of tactics in the news feed. Pages that have heavily used these tactics in the past may be more severely punished. Facebook has said (and always maintained) that it is ideal to structure your content in the most logical way. Stories that include links should be posted as links. Many page admins like to include links within the descriptions of photos, however this is against Facebook's general wishes. We always suggest to deliver your content in the best way for your audience to actually consume it.
How was this data studied?We examined ~100,000 posts over 11/4 -12/30 from approximately 1,000 pages. For any general metrics we averaged each page's metrics and looked at the median of all the pages when examining aggregate data. Any "per-fan" data examined the metric divided by the number of fans for that page on the the day of posting. Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don't have time to hunt down but want to read!  |
| You are subscribed to email updates from Moz Blog To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 | |
